return to worldwidereview.com,
the home of critical reviews
From: Jfilms Category: Films Date: 26 August 2009 Time: 06:28 AM Review: Is it ok to mispell a deliberately misspelt film titles? Is it all right to fantasise about the holocaust? I felt a slight feeling of dread at seeing Basturds due to bad reviews and the sense that if people are beginning to rewrite history for entertainment then that history may have lost its true power. No art after auschwitz has become the holocaust as just another genre to be played with. Yada yada, blah blah. Have we forgotten already. In fact Tarantino's movie turns out to be a tonic. Given that the film is produced by the Jewish American Weinsteins and that QT's not a Holocaust denier or really a closet relativist, the film acts as a thought experiment, most/all war movies are fantastic jingoistic untruthful, especially the horrific and pukily sentimental Schindlers List, so why pretend? Inglorious starts with once upon a time in Nazi occupied France.... and this makes obvious that what follows is fantasy. What if the second world war was turned upside down(most films turn war invert history by giving us some sort of happy ending) and a band of Jewish American went round murdering Nazis, and finished up by killing Hitler and all the nastiest Nazis. Isn't this what many of us daydream, and it seems perfectly valid for Tarantino to express this idea in a film. It does not say history is meaningless or all the same or all relative, it merely and creatively says here is what we desire. Amusingly the film is all talk, and little violence or action. And lost in a dream watching the absurd meandering menacing conversations, you wonder whether those going to see a bloody war film will not feel shortchanged. Bastards ends with the words "this might be my masterpiece", and perhaps the cute suggestion is accurate.