return to worldwidereview.com,
the home of critical reviews
From: Clem Category: Art Date: 11 September 2008 Time: 01:55 PM Review: Its Bacons self evident greatness as a painter,(even on just a technical level these paintings are extraordinary) ,coupled with a masochistically self deprecating honesty about the limits of existence( theres apparently no redemption here,sir, just blood on the pavement), that still never fails to get on some peoples nerves. Critical orthodoxy has it that he went downhill from the sixties on, and some critics still try to damn Bacon with accusations of mannerism and artificiality (Adrian Searle called him this week an "authentic fake"), but I hate to disappoint all you anti-Bacons, but this work lives on in the present tense. Is Bacon better than Picasso? He certainly has a greater intense identification with his subjects.The faces, especially the men from the 1950s, when you get up close, are disarmingly delicate.In the sixties its almost like he goes pop, and in comes the extraordinary saturated hues, like the blue in "Isabel Rawsthorne in Soho".The recent Roman Abramovich bought 44 million pound triptych from the 80s is dramatically convulsive, and amazing as it may sound, well worth the money.The centre depicts Prometheus(?) having his liver plucked by a vulture, and painful as it is, you can actually feel it. The gold frames and glass work really well, raising and dignifying the paintings and giving them a nice right wing elegance.Idealogues, realist painters, idealists,dogmatists and religious zealots, will all hate this show, almost as much as I hated Work no.850 by Martin Creed in the Duveen Galleries. Apologies to Sebastian Coe and those that want to bring sport and art together, but this piece of "art" is really, really, really shit.